Re: [jbosstools-dev] JSF 1.1.0.1 Reference Impl vs JSF 1.2

Hello Gurkan, If we use RHDS JSF Project Wizard and RHDS JSF 1.1 Templates with JBoss 4.2 Runtime then we add: <context-param> <param-name>org.jboss.jbossfaces.WAR_BUNDLES_JSF_IMPL</param-name> <param-value>true</param-value> </context-param> into Web.xml It allows us to run JSF project with bundled implementation. In this case we can deploy and run JSF 1.1 project via RHDS. I see some exceptions in JBoss console but it seams project works.

Monday, July 16, 2007, 2:29:56 PM, you wrote: > In WTP JSF project, you can create JSF library with wizard, then > add jsf-runtime you wish and use it. But it also provides > default runtime, while creating the Dynamic Web Project with JSF facet. > Maybe exadel could do this; > Gurkan > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Max Rydahl Andersen <max.andersen(a)redhat.com&gt; > To: Igor Shabalov <ishabalov(a)exadel.com&gt; > Cc: jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Sent: Monday, July 16, 2007 1:21:24 PM > Subject: Re: [jbosstools-dev] JSF 1.1.0.1 Reference Impl vs JSF 1.2 > Igor Shabalov wrote: >> 4.2.0 have JSF 1.2 under the hood by default. It is not expected to be compatible with any JSF 1.1 templates. >> >> We need some way to prevent deploying incompatible projects. I'd love to throw JSF 1.1 away completely, but I suspect >> that users of 4.0.5 will not appreciate such radical solution. >> Any ideas? > Isn't that was project facets are for in WTP ? > There the runtime tells you what it can actually support. > /max >> -----Original Message----- >> From: jbosstools-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org [mailto:jbosstools-dev-bounces@lists.jboss.org] On Behalf Of Marshall >> Culpepper >> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2007 3:22 PM >> To: jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> Subject: [jbosstools-dev] JSF 1.1.0.1 Reference Impl vs JSF 1.2 >> >> Hey guys.. >> >> I've been running through a demo I'm going to give tonight at a local >> JBoss User Group meeting, and I noticed some strange behavior with our >> JBoss 4.2.0.GA and using the "JSF 1.1.0.1 Reference Impl" configuration >> from the new JSF project wizard. >> >> Basically, whenever the jsf project is deployed to my clean copy of >> JBoss 4.2.0 , lots of exceptions show up (though the application itself >> seems to work fine). When I start changing things from their default >> configuration (I'm using the kickstart as a quick startup for the demo), >> JBoss consistently throws exceptions until I hard undeploy/deploy the >> app from the App Server. >> >> On the other hand, if I select a "JSF 1.2" configuration in the wizard, >> the project deploys/redeploys with no errors, and seems to work without >> a hitch with any changes I make. I guess what I'm getting at is -- if >> we're going to use JSF 1.1.0.1 Reference Implementation as the "default" >> selection in the new JSF project wizard, shouldn't we be testing it's >> "noiseyness factor"?. Would it be a problem to have JSF 1.2 selected as >> default (or maybe another configuration that JBoss 4.2.0.GA likes?) >> > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Shape Yahoo! in your own image. Join our Network Research Panel > today! http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 > _______________________________________________ > jbosstools-dev mailing list > jbosstools-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosstools-dev