thanks for your replies Max, I've added some more comments below and
await comments from the others..
regards!
/Ole
Max Rydahl Andersen skrev:
> since the 2 scenarios for running jbossws differ in terms of
> deployment and available functionality, we need to decide how we
> handle that difference.. consider the situation when a developer runs
> jbossws standalone;
>
> 1) there is no "JBoss Server" to deploy to..
> - do we need to create a new "server plugin" in wtp for this setup
> or can we use the existing Tomcat Server?
Don't know ;) Rob ?
> - will the deployment-features in jbosside still be usable for
> another server type?
sorry.. here I also meant the "packaging-stuff" that marshall is working
on..
We use WTP, so hopefully yes (to a certain degree ;)
> 2) there is no support for remaining JBoss functionality (EJBs, etc..)
> - should related features in the jbosside be disabled / adapted?
Why disabled ?
Adapted ? I don't think our ejb stuff is tied hardly to jboss (only
our own WTP plugin is jboss specific)
> should jbosside even support this setup?
Our priority is of course that it works with JBoss.
After that deployment of WS to Websphere and weblogic would be
interesting.
> or should we create a standalone "jbossws-eclipse-plugin" that is
> independant of jboss/jbosside?
I don't see the need ;)
I do, it would be great to be able to just use the
jbossws stack without
being required to use either jboss or jbosside.. (that's a personal note
;-)
> There is maybe also a "strategic" aspect.. does jboss want to push
> jbossws as a standalone ws-stack (as for example axis, xfire, etc..)
> or is this more a "sidekick" that we can initially "ignore" in
> jbosside and our plugin?
I would say ignore for now unless it is trivial to create some initial
support for it.
/max
> Max Rydahl Andersen skrev:
>> On Mon, 17 Jul 2006 10:15:54 +0200, Ole Matzura <ole(a)eviware.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all!
>>>
>>> We have just released the first beta of soapui 1.6 (including our
>>> initial jbossws wstools integration) and I am now finally writing a
>>> specification for the "jbosside-soapui-plugin".. one issue that
>>> struck me was the fact the jbossws is no longer tied to jboss (ie
>>> it can be run in a standalone tomcat installation).. should our
>>> plugin support that setup? How would that be affected by jbosside
>>> functionality (packaging, deployment, etc..), do we need to provide
>>> this functionality "by ourselves" our could the jbosside
>>> infrastructure still be used for standalone jbossws-installations?
>>>
>>> what are your thoughts?
>>
>> I don't what the problem is ;)
>>
>> Doesn't the soapui-thingy "just" allow for editing ws specific
files
>> independent
>> of what target it is being deployed to ?
>>
>> ----
>> Max Rydahl Andersen
>> callto://max.rydahl.andersen
>>
>> Hibernate
>> max(a)hibernate.org
>>
http://hibernate.org
>>
>> JBoss Inc
>> max.andersen(a)jboss.com
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> jbosside-dev mailing list
> jbosside-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbosside-dev
----
Max Rydahl Andersen
callto://max.rydahl.andersen
Hibernate
max(a)hibernate.org
http://hibernate.org
JBoss Inc
max.andersen(a)jboss.com