Re: JBossWS 2.0.1 minimum JBoss version?
by Thomas Diesler
Hi David,
the hudson QA has been done against 4.0.5.GA, so that would be the
officially supported community release.
The smoke tests fail against 4.0.4.GA
-thomas
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 09:47 -0400, David Boeren wrote:
> What is the minimum version of JBoss that can be used with JBossWS
> 2.0.1? I have a customer asking whether it is compatible with
> 4.0.4.GA. If it cannot run on 4.0.4, what is the highest version that can?
>
> Thanks!
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
Web Service Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
19 years, 1 month
WS-Policy, WS-Addressing, WS-ReliableMessaging
by ropalka＠redhat.com
Hi Guys,
another topic I'd like to discuss with you:
We should support multiple versions of the following specs:
[SHOULD] WS-Addressing
[SHOULD] WS-Policy
[NICE] WS-ReliableMessaging
I know, we already support WS-Addressing multiple versions. To achieve this we
just need to add another spec builder there.
But I mean to make it possible to use multiple WS-Addressing versions / per
JVM.
This is prohibited in current architecture :-(
Cheers,
Richard
19 years, 1 month
WS-RM configuration
by ropalka＠redhat.com
Hi Guys,
this e-mail deals with WS-RM configuration that will be used on
both client and server side. There are three files attached to this mail:
WS-RM configuration schema document
WS-RM client side configuration example
WS-RM server side configuration example
These WS-RM configuration files will be used in conjunction with
WS-Policy specifications. I hope all attached files are self explanatory
and everybody understands its content including the comments.
If you have any questions, comments or suggestions let's talk about it ;-)
Cheers,
Richard
19 years, 1 month
Re: Intro and WS-stack abstraction
by Thomas Diesler
The SPI actually breaks down into two abstraction layers
#1 container SPI (deployment model, invocation, etc)
#2 stack SPI (request/response processing)
The SPI is not bound to JBossAS, hence it should theoretically be
possible to support other containers (i.e. Tomcat) and other WS stacks
(i.e. Axis)
Currently we have SPI implementations for jboss-4.0, jboss-4.2,
jboss-5.0 on the container side and on the stack side for
JBossWS-Native, Sun-Metro, Apache-CXF.
cheers
-thomas
On Mon, 2007-09-10 at 15:44 +0200, Tom Baeyens wrote:
> Hi Thomas, meet Charles and Miguel from Bull. I'm working with them on the new
> Process Virtual Machine implementation.
>
> Charles and Miguel, meet Thomas Diesler, the web services lead at JBoss.
>
> I heard you had injected an abstraction interface for the web service stack to be
> pluggable. Bull is interested in this layer. Two questions that I couldn't answer
> were the following:
>
> Was that layer designed only for internal usage or is it also consumable from by
> external clients ?
>
> Can you use the pluggability layer outside the appserver ? Which WS-stack
> implementations can be used in e.g. tomcat ?
>
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
Web Service Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
19 years, 1 month
[Fwd: Change in package name for SecurityContextFactory]
by Darran Lofthouse
-------- Forwarded Message --------
> From: Anil Saldhana <Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com>
> To: Darran Lofthouse <dlofthouse(a)redhat.com>
> Subject: Change in package name for SecurityContextFactory
> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:33:47 -0500
>
> can u forward this, please?
>
> --
> >
> > email message attachment
> > > -------- Forwarded Message --------
> > > From: Anil Saldhana <Anil.Saldhana(a)redhat.com>
> > > To: jbossws-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> > > Subject: Change in package name for SecurityContextFactory
> > > Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 10:32:22 -0500
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > > I remember Thomas making use of a Security class called as
> > > "org.jboss.security.plugins.SecurityContextFactory".
> > >
> > > I am moving that to "org.jboss.security.SecurityContextFactory"
> > > tomorrow (basically from an implementation detail to a SPI). I do not
> > > think this WS code that references this exists in the AS5 workspace.
> > >
> > > Please tell me if this is going to be a major concern for you, right
> > > away. If yes, I will retain the class at the old location until you
> > > migrate over.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Anil
--
Regards,
Darran Lofthouse.
Senior Software Maintenance Engineer
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
19 years, 1 month
