Hi Richard,
I added technology specific categories because I thought I forgot to
do it
no problem :-)
> Do you think added value comes from technology specific grouping
of
> pages?
It could be useful but it's not necessary IMHO. If it breaks our
categories policy, we should remove them
> Btw I'm also concerned about the CXF, Native and Metro category:
According to our categories policy they are useless
> I think the Native category would need to include so many pages that
> it becomes actually useless. Having the 3 user guide pages that link
> to all the stack specific pages is the right solution imho.
> Any thought about this?
I/we have actually set no category policy, it's
just a matter of
grouping the pages in a useful way for the user. When we started working
at the wiki we though that way could be to follow the lifecycle of a
(ws) application; that's the reason for the high level category names.
This doesn't mean this has to be the only way of grouping pages (hence
my first email today ;-) )
Cheers
Alessio