I'd suggest doing WS-Policy first because several other
specifications need it.
Mark.
On 27 Feb 2007, at 17:34, Thomas Diesler wrote:
I am wondering whether to integrate WS-Policy, WS-PolicyAttachments
first before we move on to WS-RM. From an implemenation perspective
WS-RM depends on WS-PO, WS-POA
On Tue, 2007-02-27 at 13:27 +0000, Mark Little wrote:
> Are you asking whether WS-Policy is a better starting point than
> WS-RM?
>
> Mark.
>
>
> On 27 Feb 2007, at 13:17, Thomas Diesler wrote:
>
>> Hi Folks,
>>
>> you've probably already noticed that WS-RM has dependency on WS-
>> Policy,
>> WS-PolicyAttachment for configuration purposes. Not sure if it makes
>> sense to start with those pieces. OTOH it may make sence to provide
>> configuration aspects in an alternative manner to get started.
>>
>> cheers
>> -thomas
>>
>> --
>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Thomas Diesler
>> Web Service Lead
>> JBoss, a division of Red Hat
>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jbossws-dev mailing list
>> jbossws-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossws-dev
>
--
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thomas Diesler
Web Service Lead
JBoss, a division of Red Hat
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx