Also, just for the heck of it, I did a quick scan of shell scripts on fedora: # No .sh ending /usr/bin $ ls | xargs file | grep -i shell | grep -v \\.sh | wc -l 252 # .sh ending /usr/bin $ ls | xargs file | grep -i shell | grep \\.sh | wc -l 8 -Jason On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 23:40 -0600, Jason T. Greene wrote: > Ok I am mostly convinced, although ant doesn't use ".sh" > > On Tue, 2007-02-13 at 23:32 -0600, Alejandro Guízar wrote: >> Ant and countless other software uses .sh as well. When you see the .sh >> extension you immediately knows what the contents of the file are. The >> same does not apply to a file without extension. >> >> I'd go for keeping .sh. >> >> -Alejandro >> >> Jason T. Greene wrote: >>> Hi Thomas, >>> >>> I was planning on dropping the sh extension for JAX-WS tools. The reason >>> is so that the same command works for all platforms. This works since on >>> windows you don't need to type the .bat extension to execute the script. >>> However everything else in jboss uses .sh, and the old tools use .sh. So >>> perhaps it's bad to break convention. >>> >>> How do you want to do this? >>> >>> -Jason >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> jbossws-dev mailing list >>> jbossws-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossws-dev > _______________________________________________ > jbossws-dev mailing list > jbossws-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/jbossws-dev