This is related to
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBMETA-64.
Well, considering the api doc says the default name should be as is now in trunk, I was
thinking it's probably better to close the issue as "won't fix" (thus
changing the behavior we had in Beta4). On my side I would have changed the tests, in
order not to use the default name (i.e. I'll always use the name attribute) to pass on
both containers. My only concern now is that the old naming default was probably used to
cope with cases of multiple class having different attribute annotated with @WebServiceRef
with the same name:
...
public class A
{
@WebServiceRef
private ServiceOne prettyService;
...
}
...
public class B
{
@WebServiceRef
private ServiceTwo prettyService;
...
}
What do you think about this Emanuel?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160024#...
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&a...