Re: [jsr-314-open] Outcome of JSFDays discussions
Ed Burns wrote On 4/14/2009 8:26 PM ET:
>>>>> On Thu, 02 Apr 2009 09:24:59 +0200, Martin
Marinschek <mmarinschek(a)APACHE.ORG> said:
>>>>>
MM> - A very small thing, but could be very useful: we could define that
MM> the component-tag-handler of the facelets-vdl needs to put the
MM> location of the component into the component-attributes map. With
MM> this, we can emit the location of the component if there is an
MM> exception during any lifecyle-phase - I believe this would help many
MM> application developers. We can do this now (and shouldn't have done
MM> before) cause with partial-state it is not a problem to have this
MM> information in the component attributes map.
Done.
I had suggested that we only save the location information when the
project stage is development. Martin seemed to agree that this was a
reasonable idea:
AS> Definitely a fan of anything that we can do to improve ease
of
AS> debugging. Regarding full vs partial state saving... I am thinking
AS> that we may need to save full state in certain cases (eg. if we run into
AS> cases that partial state saving cannot handle correctly). If we are
AS> concerned about bloating the saved state size with location information
AS> in such cases, one option might be to only store location information
AS> when project stage == development. Actually, perhaps only storing
AS> location information during the development (or, at least,
AS> non-production) stage might not be a bad idea anyway?
a very reasonable idea!
regards,
Martin
Was this suggestion included in the solution?
Andy
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 2.7 KB)