Re: [jsr-314-open] [JSF 2.1 NEW] composite component namespace simplification
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Martin Marinschek
<mmarinschek(a)apache.org>wrote:
Hi guys,
very useful discussion.
I like a) the most, and my +10 for the URN-version for the core taglibs as
well. Beautiful!
I think it actually has to be a), so that we are inline with our
specifications for the core taglibs, and that we don´t pollute the namespace
too much.
The lobbyists have been successful. I switch my vote to (a).
I´m sitting right here imaginating there comes the day were I don`t have to
tell developers to copy out the header "from some other file".
Exactly! In fact, I just did that tonight! I do that every time I have to
create a new XHTML file (without an IDE). I have to search my system for my
trust "steal me" template and paste it in. But here, I can do it from
memory!
<f:view xmlns:f="jsf:core" xmlns:h="jsf:html">
</f:view>
-Dan
--
Dan Allen
Senior Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597
http://mojavelinux.com
http://mojavelinux.com/seaminaction
http://www.google.com/profiles/dan.j.allen
Attachments:
- attachment.html (text/html — 1.7 KB)