Hi Werner -
Thanks for bringing this up. I'll take a look to see how jsdoc is
processing these functions.
-roger
On 7/23/10 9:08 AM, Werner Punz wrote:
Hello everyone while checking the jsdocs of 2.0 rev a, I stumbled
upon
something which does not make too much sense to me: following new
definitions:
<inner>
*isAutoExec
<file:///Users/werpu2/Desktop/jsf-2_0_rev_a_fr-all-spec/jsdocs/symbols/jsf.ajax.html#-isAutoExec>*()
<inner>
*replaceNode
<file:///Users/werpu2/Desktop/jsf-2_0_rev_a_fr-all-spec/jsdocs/symbols/jsf.ajax.html#-replaceNode>*(node,
newNode)
Replace one node with another.
Both functions being exposed in the jsdocs but marked as inner
functions (which are then not exposed to the outside)
Both do not make any sense in their respective location within
jsf.ajax, if they should be jsdocwise exposed they probably would make
more sense under jsf.util, and in case of replaceNode I am not
entirely convinced if it should be exposed documentationwise at all.
Do not get me wrong both implementations definitely already have
implemented both functions otherwise the impls would not work, but why
exposing them jsdocwise?
Was this an accident or was there a reason behind it.
Werner
--
roger.kitain(a)oracle.com
https://twitter.com/rogerk09
http://www.java.net/blogs/rogerk