Hi That's cool. Just one minor comment. Looking the documentation I saw UIData.getClientId still return the id with the rowIndex added. In the mails to this list with this subject: [jsr-314-open] Ajax inside a DataTable It was told it is better to change the behavior of UIData.getClientId, to it does not include the id and instead set this behavior on UIData.getContainerClientId. This requires some small changes on UIData.invokeOnComponent (call UIData.getContainerClientId instead UIData.getClientId) and other methods, but it seems the way to go. Could you please consider this change to be included in Rev A? I created a spec issue here: https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=865 Thanks a lot for you attention. I'll keep an eye if this is finally include in JSF 2.0 Rev A. I already committed this change on myfaces but if it is not accepted or deffered by some reason to 2.1 I'll revert those changes. best regards, Leonardo Uribe 2010/7/10 Ed Burns <edward.burns(a)oracle.com&gt; Hello Experts, > > As mentioned at the 20100707 Expert Community meeting, here is the release > candidate 1 of the JSF 2.0 Rev a specification. [1]. There really isn't > any room for modifications for 2.0 Rev a at this point, but if you find > something major, please let me know. Otherwise, please continue to log > issues in the javaserverfaces-spec-public issuetracker. > > Please keep in mind this description of 2.0 Rev a when reviewing it, > taken from the javaserverfaces-spec-public home page. > > This effort will include work that does not require any change in > behavior of the implementation (including any signature changes) or > TCK. This work will be limited to spec edits. This work will be > conducted under the JCP Minor Revision process. Because there are no > implementation changes, no new release of the Reference Implementation > (RI) or Test and Compatibility Kit (TCK) will be produced to accompany > 2.0 Rev a. The existing JSF 2.0 RI and TCK will be sufficient for this > purpose. > > For my money, the more interesting release is 2.1, which is currently in > progress. > > Thanks, > > Ed > > [1] > https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocument... > > -- > | edburns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017 > | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/ >

Hello Leonardo, We cannot make this kind of change for Rev A. Only supposed to be spec doc changes. But I see this issue is currently unscheduled - I'll see if we can schedule it in for one of our 2.1 milestones. I'm going to be revisiting a bunch of those issues to prioritize accordingly. Thanks, Roger. On 7/13/10 3:11 PM, Leonardo Uribe wrote: > It was told it is better to change the behavior of UIData.getClientId, to > it does not include the id and instead set this behavior on > UIData.getContainerClientId. This requires some small changes on > UIData.invokeOnComponent (call UIData.getContainerClientId instead > UIData.getClientId) and other methods, but it seems the way to go. Could you > please consider this change to be included in Rev A? > -- roger.kitain(a)oracle.com https://twitter.com/rogerk09 http://www.java.net/blogs/rogerk

Hello Experts, As mentioned at the 20100707 Expert Community meeting, here is the release candidate 1 of the JSF 2.0 Rev a specification. [1]. There really isn't any room for modifications for 2.0 Rev a at this point, but if you find something major, please let me know. Otherwise, please continue to log issues in the javaserverfaces-spec-public issuetracker. Please keep in mind this description of 2.0 Rev a when reviewing it, taken from the javaserverfaces-spec-public home page. This effort will include work that does not require any change in behavior of the implementation (including any signature changes) or TCK. This work will be limited to spec edits. This work will be conducted under the JCP Minor Revision process. Because there are no implementation changes, no new release of the Reference Implementation (RI) or Test and Compatibility Kit (TCK) will be produced to accompany 2.0 Rev a. The existing JSF 2.0 RI and TCK will be sufficient for this purpose. For my money, the more interesting release is 2.1, which is currently in progress. Thanks, Ed [1] https://javaserverfaces-spec-public.dev.java.net/servlets/ProjectDocument... -- | edburns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017 | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/