[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-11738?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s...
]
Brian Leathem commented on RF-11738:
------------------------------------
I agree the extendedDataTable and dataTable should have the same defaults for cellpadding
and cellspacing. However, changing the defaults will have an impact on the L&F of
existing applications, and we will have to do so carefully.
To add the cellpadding and cellspacing, the logical place to do so is in _UIDataTableBase_
which will enable to attribute in the following classes:
||Class|| Current cellpadding||Current cellspacing||
|_AbstractDataTable_ | _unset_ | _unset_ |
|_AbstractExtendedDataTable_ | 0 | 0 |
|_AbstractCollapsibleSubTable_ | _unset_ | _unset_ |
rich:dataTable doesn't generate cellspacing = 0 and cellpadding =
0
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: RF-11738
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-11738
Project: RichFaces
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: component-tables
Affects Versions: 4.1.0.CR1
Reporter: Karsten Wutzke
Labels: cellpadding, cellspacing
I often have the requirement for rounded tables, with RF 4 datatables this isn't
possible *at all*. For a rounded HTML table to render correctly, the CSS attribute
border-collapse: separate; must be used because border-collapse: collapse; is incompatible
with CSS 3, see
http://vamin.net/examples/rounded_tables2.html (view source).
border-collapse: separate; however needs cellspacing = 0, which isn't produced by RF
datatables, so rounded borders with datatables can *never* be accomplished without visual
artifacts.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira