]
Ilya Shaikovsky updated RF-10762:
---------------------------------
Assignee: Nick Belaevski (was: Ilya Shaikovsky)
dataScroller: inconsistency between facets names in code contants and
ones used for rendering.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: RF-10762
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/RF-10762
Project: RichFaces
Issue Type: Bug
Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
Components: component-tables
Affects Versions: 4.0.0.Final
Reporter: Ilya Shaikovsky
Assignee: Nick Belaevski
Priority: Minor
functionally all is working fine. And documentation (need to check b.t.w.) will help the
user to define right facets.
But some of the community guys according to questions among the thread and myself b.t.w.
do not open docs for minor checks but looking into UI class code instead.
There are next constants:
public static final String FIRST_FACET_NAME = "first";
public static final String LAST_FACET_NAME = "last";
public static final String NEXT_FACET_NAME = "next";
public static final String PREVIOUS_FACET_NAME = "previous";
public static final String FAST_FORWARD_FACET_NAME = "fastforward";
public static final String FAST_REWIND_FACET_NAME = "fastrewind";
public static final String FIRST_DISABLED_FACET_NAME = "first_disabled";
public static final String LAST_DISABLED_FACET_NAME = "last_disabled";
but them not used in renderer and just string constant used there. And moreover
fastrewind and fastforward used in camel case.
So proposed to use constant for consistency. But change ones which not the same as
currently in renderer in order not to break compatibility,.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: