Re: [teiid-users] [teiid-dev] What should we call this artifact?
Based on the majority we are going to call this VDB as "Dynamic VDB".
Thanks for all who has participated.
Please note there will not be any change in the dot extension of the
artifact, that will be still ".def" and ".vdb" are before.
Please checkout the following document pages for "Dynamic VDB" and try
to build a VDB example and let us know if the instructions are
incomplete or confusing.
http://www.jboss.org/community/wiki/TeiidConnectorSuppliedMetadata
http://www.jboss.org/community/wiki/QuickStartExampleUsingConnectorsuppli...
http://www.jboss.org/community/wiki/DefiningConnectorsforTeiidDynamicVDB
Thank you once again.
Ramesh..
On Fri, 2009-08-28 at 15:05 -0500, Ramesh Reddy wrote:
Hi,
You all know that starting with 6.2 release we have a new feature called
"Connector Supplied Metadata", where connectors will be able to import
metadata dynamically at runtime for data integration purposes.
To use this feature user need to write ".def" file, which we been
calling internally "vdbLess" mode, that does not sound correct. We are
building a VDB and all the access is to this no different than a regular
VDB, so it is a VDB just not built using the Designer!
I have been calling it "DEF file based VDB", some names thrown out are
"dynamic vdb" or "direct vdb" etc. Can you suggest a good name for
this,
so that we all can refer it by the same name?
Thanks
Ramesh..
_______________________________________________
teiid-dev mailing list
teiid-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/teiid-dev