Not sure which version of the spec your'e looking at, but this was
already fixed in my version.
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 6:25 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de> wrote:
txs Pete!
We should also fix the example in the Spec 9.2 (and maybe others).
LieGrue,
strub
--- Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> schrieb am Mi, 2.12.2009:
> Von: Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
> Betreff: Re: [weld-dev] Do interceptor methods need to declare an Exception to be
thrown?
> An: "Mark Struberg" <struberg(a)yahoo.de>
> CC: weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> Datum: Mittwoch, 2. Dezember 2009, 12:16
> Correct, please file a CDITCK issue!
>
> On 2 Dec 2009, at 11:03, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > Somewhere in the back of my brain, I remember that
> >
> > @AroundInvoke
> > public void dingsBums(InvocationContext ivc) throws
> Exception;
> >
> > MUST declare the 'throws Exception', otherwise it's
> illegal.
> >
> > Am I right, or is my brain tricking me?
> >
> > If the Exception is mandatory, the TCK needs to be
> changed:
> >
> org.jboss.jsr299.tck.tests.context.passivating.KokkolaInterceptor
>
> > (and maybe others)
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen
> herausragenden Schutz gegen Massenmails.
> >
http://mail.yahoo.com
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > weld-dev mailing list
> > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev
>
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz gegen
Massenmails.
http://mail.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
weld-dev mailing list
weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/weld-dev