WELD-862 and Seam Cron
by Peter Royle
Hi,
I'm aiming to make a release of Seam Cron available within the next two weeks. Currently there is an outstanding issue (https://issues.jboss.org/browse/WELD-862) which prevents Cron from running properly with Weld. I have been able to carry on developing Cron by testing it against OpenWebBeans, but obviously if we are to release a Seam module it should work against Weld.
It would be nice if WELD-862 could be fixed as soon a possible so that all future versions will work well with Cron.
But more importantly I also probably need to do something special in Cron so that it will work with the version of Weld already deployed in JBoss AS and Glassfish, which will contain the bug. The workaround mentioned in the bug report is to deep copy the InvocationContext. I attempted to do this by serialising and unserialising the InvocationContext but couldn't due to UnserializableExceptions. Does anyone have any advice for me about how I might be able to work around this bug to support existing versions of Weld?
Cheers,
Pete R
9 months, 2 weeks
Re: [weld-dev] CDI JavaSE tck
by Emily Jiang
ok. Thanks Martin!
Many thanks,
Emily
===========================
Emily Jiang
WebSphere Application Server, CDI & MicroProfile Development Lead
MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
From: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
To: Emily Jiang <EMIJIANG(a)uk.ibm.com>, Matej Novotny
<manovotn(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>, Weld
<weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Date: 17/10/2017 15:14
Subject: Re: [weld-dev] CDI JavaSE tck
Dne 17.10.2017 v 16:01 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> Back to my original question, TestGroups.SE is not supposed to be run by
> an application server such as Wildfly, Glassfish, Liberty, right?
Yes.
> For certifying EE8, these tests are supposed to be excluded by JavaEE
> runtimes?
Yes. A Java EE runtime TCK runner should not include the tests from this
group.
> Are these tests only for JavaSE runtime such as Hammock?
TestGroups.SE is supposed to be run by a CDI implementation itself.
>
> Many thanks,
> Emily
> ===========================
> Emily Jiang
> WebSphere Application Server, CDI & MicroProfile Development Lead
>
> MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
>
> Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
> Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
>
>
>
>
> From: Matej Novotny <manovotn(a)redhat.com>
> To: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
> Cc: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>, Emily Jiang
> <EMIJIANG(a)uk.ibm.com>, Weld <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Date: 17/10/2017 14:17
> Subject: Re: [weld-dev] CDI JavaSE tck
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
> Sorry for later answer, yea the only TCK test is the one which Martin
> pointed to.
> However, I don't see much need to cover this particular case on EE part.
> The section of the spec which defines throwing ISE with multiple
> providers belongs to SE part of the spec, so it feel natural that it's
> tested there.
>
> Though if you feel like we should have even EE test then by all means
> feel free to create JIRA ticket for this and I'll eventually get to it.
>
> Matej
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Martin Kouba" <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
> > To: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>, "Emily Jiang"
> <EMIJIANG(a)uk.ibm.com>, "Weld" <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 8:53:26 AM
> > Subject: Re: [weld-dev] CDI JavaSE tck
> >
> > Dne 16.10.2017 v 20:30 John D. Ament napsal(a):
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:07 PM Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com
> > > <mailto:mkouba@redhat.com>> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Emily,
> > >
> > > tests from TestGroups.SE should NOT be run in a Java EE
> environment.
> > > Note that CDI Bootstrap API should not even work in a Java EE
> container
> > > (SeContainerInitializer.newInstance() should throw
> > > IllegalStateException).
> > >
> > >
> > > Isn't there a TCK test for that?
> >
> > I think not. There is a test in CDI API which verifies that
> > IllegalStateException is thrown if none or multiple service providers
> > are found [1]. But it's actually a good idea to create a new TCK test
> > with TestGroups.INTEGRATION group to verify ISE is thrown in a Java
EE
> > container.
> >
> > M
> >
> > [1]
> >
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_cdi-2Dspe...
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > Dne 16.10.2017 v 14:33 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> > > > Hi Matej/Martin,
> > > >
> > > > I am looking at the CDI 2.0 tck on JavaSE. I saw they are
> under the
> > > > groups of "SE". Should the tcks be exercised by JavaEE
> runtime, e.g.
> > > > wildfly, glassfish, Liberty etc? Which profile did you
> package the
> > > > JavaSE tck?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Many thanks,
> > > > Emily
> > > > ===========================
> > > > Emily Jiang
> > > > WebSphere Application Server, CDI & MicroProfile Development
> Lead
> > > >
> > > > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> > > > Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 <tel:+44%201962%20816278>
Internal:
> > > > 246278
> > > >
> > > > Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com <mailto:emijiang@uk.ibm.com>
> > > > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales
> with
> > > number
> > > > 741598.
> > > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
> > > Hampshire PO6 3AU
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > weld-dev mailing list
> > > > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:weld-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> > > >
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.jboss.org_mail...
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Martin Kouba
> > > Senior Software Engineer
> > > Red Hat, Czech Republic
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > weld-dev mailing list
> > > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:weld-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> > >
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.jboss.org_mail...
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Martin Kouba
> > Senior Software Engineer
> > Red Hat, Czech Republic
> > _______________________________________________
> > weld-dev mailing list
> > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.jboss.org_mail...
>
>
>
> Unless stated otherwise above:
> IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
> 741598.
> Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6
3AU
--
Martin Kouba
Senior Software Engineer
Red Hat, Czech Republic
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
9 years
Re: [weld-dev] CDI JavaSE tck
by Emily Jiang
Back to my original question, TestGroups.SE is not supposed to be run by
an application server such as Wildfly, Glassfish, Liberty, right? For
certifying EE8, these tests are supposed to be excluded by JavaEE
runtimes? Are these tests only for JavaSE runtime such as Hammock?
Many thanks,
Emily
===========================
Emily Jiang
WebSphere Application Server, CDI & MicroProfile Development Lead
MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
From: Matej Novotny <manovotn(a)redhat.com>
To: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
Cc: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>, Emily Jiang
<EMIJIANG(a)uk.ibm.com>, Weld <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Date: 17/10/2017 14:17
Subject: Re: [weld-dev] CDI JavaSE tck
Sorry for later answer, yea the only TCK test is the one which Martin
pointed to.
However, I don't see much need to cover this particular case on EE part.
The section of the spec which defines throwing ISE with multiple providers
belongs to SE part of the spec, so it feel natural that it's tested there.
Though if you feel like we should have even EE test then by all means feel
free to create JIRA ticket for this and I'll eventually get to it.
Matej
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Martin Kouba" <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
> To: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>, "Emily Jiang"
<EMIJIANG(a)uk.ibm.com>, "Weld" <weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 8:53:26 AM
> Subject: Re: [weld-dev] CDI JavaSE tck
>
> Dne 16.10.2017 v 20:30 John D. Ament napsal(a):
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:07 PM Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com
> > <mailto:mkouba@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Emily,
> >
> > tests from TestGroups.SE should NOT be run in a Java EE
environment.
> > Note that CDI Bootstrap API should not even work in a Java EE
container
> > (SeContainerInitializer.newInstance() should throw
> > IllegalStateException).
> >
> >
> > Isn't there a TCK test for that?
>
> I think not. There is a test in CDI API which verifies that
> IllegalStateException is thrown if none or multiple service providers
> are found [1]. But it's actually a good idea to create a new TCK test
> with TestGroups.INTEGRATION group to verify ISE is thrown in a Java EE
> container.
>
> M
>
> [1]
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_cdi-2Dspe...
>
> >
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > Dne 16.10.2017 v 14:33 Emily Jiang napsal(a):
> > > Hi Matej/Martin,
> > >
> > > I am looking at the CDI 2.0 tck on JavaSE. I saw they are under
the
> > > groups of "SE". Should the tcks be exercised by JavaEE runtime,
e.g.
> > > wildfly, glassfish, Liberty etc? Which profile did you package
the
> > > JavaSE tck?
> > >
> > >
> > > Many thanks,
> > > Emily
> > > ===========================
> > > Emily Jiang
> > > WebSphere Application Server, CDI & MicroProfile Development
Lead
> > >
> > > MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
> > > Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 <tel:+44%201962%20816278> Internal:
> > > 246278
> > >
> > > Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com <mailto:emijiang@uk.ibm.com>
> > > Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
> > >
> > >
> > > Unless stated otherwise above:
> > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales
with
> > number
> > > 741598.
> > > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth,
> > Hampshire PO6 3AU
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > weld-dev mailing list
> > > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:weld-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> > >
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.jboss.org_mail...
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Martin Kouba
> > Senior Software Engineer
> > Red Hat, Czech Republic
> > _______________________________________________
> > weld-dev mailing list
> > weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:weld-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> >
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.jboss.org_mail...
> >
>
> --
> Martin Kouba
> Senior Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Czech Republic
> _______________________________________________
> weld-dev mailing list
> weld-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.jboss.org_mail...
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
9 years
CDI JavaSE tck
by Emily Jiang
Hi Matej/Martin,
I am looking at the CDI 2.0 tck on JavaSE. I saw they are under the groups
of "SE". Should the tcks be exercised by JavaEE runtime, e.g. wildfly,
glassfish, Liberty etc? Which profile did you package the JavaSE tck?
Many thanks,
Emily
===========================
Emily Jiang
WebSphere Application Server, CDI & MicroProfile Development Lead
MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU
9 years
