Hi Pete;
So far, we have used WebBeans in everywhere including documentation, blogs, presentation
etc.
It's great to stick with WebBeans;
PS : Altough I registered with the webbeans-dev list, I am not able to send message here.
I would like to post some important messages related with the specification that we have
encountered while implementing the specification. Is there any way other?
Thanks a lot;
Gurkan Erdogdu
OpenWebBeans,
http://incubator.apache.org/openwebbeans/
gurkanerdogdu(a)yahoo.com
________________________________
From: Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
To: webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Sent: Wednesday, December 3, 2008 4:36:49 PM
Subject: Fwd: [webbeans-dev] Terminology
Begin forwarded message:
From: Michael Rotatori <rotatori(a)sbcglobal.net>
Date: 3 December 2008 14:08:19 GMT
To: Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [webbeans-dev] Terminology
Reply-To: rotatori(a)sbcglobal.net
I think it should be kept as Web Bean. LIke you said, it sounds like a new model. It needs
to be separate from an ejb bean name.
--- On Wed, 12/3/08, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
From: Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [webbeans-dev] Terminology
To: "Gavin King" <gavin(a)hibernate.org>
Cc: "webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org" <webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>,
"Java Community Process JSR #299 Expert List" <JSR-299-EG(a)jcp.org>,
"Scott Ferguson" <ferg(a)caucho.com>
Date: Wednesday, December 3, 2008, 6:40 AM
On 24 Nov 2008, at 13:06, Gavin King wrote:
I've had a few discussions with a certain EE vendor who is
concerned
that the use of the "Bean" terminology sends
the message that
Web
Beans is a separate component model that competes with EJB. I
don't
necessarily agree, but I can see why some people might get that
impression. Whatever: on this issue I think we should do whatever is
necessary to make 299 palatable to all the vendors in the space.
So we should search for alternative terminology. Here's my suggestion:
Web Bean -> injectable type
simple Web Bean -> injectable java class
enterprise Web Bean -> session bean
Web Bean instance -> injectable instance / instance of an injectable
type
This seems quite fragmented to me, I guess I would go for something
like:
Web Bean -> injectable bean
Simple Web Bean -> injectable JavaBean
Enterprise Web Bean -> session bean
Web Bean instance -> injectable bean instance or just bean instance
This means we loose the
proper noun (Web Bean) which I think is what
makes it sounds more like a new model, but to me seems more consistent
with Java terminology.
WDYT? Does anyone have a better suggestion? Does anyone *not* want to
make this change?
--
Gavin King
gavin.king(a)gmail.com
http://in.relation.to/Bloggers/Gavin
http://hibernate.org
http://seamframework.org
_______________________________________________
webbeans-dev mailing list
webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev
_______________________________________________
webbeans-dev mailing list
webbeans-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/webbeans-dev