I also think that adding the most popular 3rd party constraints directly to
the spec is a good thing. Especially @NotBlank and @NotEmpty.
However, I also agree that it would be nice to gather more feedback from
the community to learn which constraints people would like to see in the
spec.
2016-09-06 20:50 GMT+02:00 Michael Nascimento <misterm(a)gmail.com>:
+1 to including them.
Regards,
Michael
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Marco Molteni <moltenma(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It would be possible to add some built-in constraints to the V 2.0?
>
> @NotBlank, @NotEmpty, @Length are used very often in projects, they are
> already present in Hibernate Validator and their implementation is well
> defined.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Here a list of the most used constraint for GitHub's projects (the
numbers
> change at every request but you get the idea. HV = Hibernate Validator,
BV =
> Bean Validation):
>
> 189'143 - BV - NotNull
> 56'902 - BV - Size
> 39'551 - HV - NotEmpty <-
> 20'687 - HV - NotBlank <-
> 17'735 - BV - Pattern
> 16'763 - HV - Email
> 16'033 - BV - Min
> 12'769 - HV - Length <-
> 7'806 - BV - Digits
> 4'982 - BV - Max
> 4'971 - BV - Past
> 3'598 - BV - DecimalMin
> 2'753 - BV - AssertTrue
> 2'379 - BV - DecimalMax
> 2'308 - BV - Future
> 1'999 - HV - Range
> 1'497 - HV - URL
> < 1'000 other constraints
>
> Thanks
>
> Cheers
>
> Marco
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev