Re: [bv-dev] Should getters be considered methods during validation

On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org&gt; wrote: > For method validation, we have so far managed to get away with > requiring an annotation based metadata to direct how method validation > behaves. > > One question that popped up during the recent write up is whether or not > getters should be considered regular methods and thus be intercepted and > validation by CDI or AspectJ interceptors. > > I have my own ideas, but I'd like to get your opinion on the subject. Hi, Emmanuel! Great/horrible question. :) My inclination, for the purposes of the specification, is "a method is a method" but I'd hope to see implementation-specific mechanisms to globally disable method validation on getters. $0.02, Matt > > Emmanuel > _______________________________________________ > beanvalidation-dev mailing list > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev