> Btw. there isn't much package-level JavaDoc for the BV API in
general
> (only for javax.validation.groups). I think we should add some more
> for BV 1.1. WDYT?
+1 just create a pull request ;-)
Hehe, for now I've created a ticket [1] so we don't forget about it.
--Gunnar
[1]
https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/BVAL-266
2012/2/25 Hardy Ferentschik <hardy(a)hibernate.org>:
>
> On Feb 25, 2012, at 14:15, Gunnar Morling <gunnar.morling(a)googlemail.com>
wrote:
>
>> Based on the contained classes I'm supposing that the BV spi package
>> has a much more focused scope (bootstrapping). Then
>> ParameterNameProvider should go into javax.validation. Any thoughts?
>
> I think you are right that the current API package is focused on bootstrapping.
Unless the whole spi structure would get changed (which we really cannot do), I think the
best option is javax.validation.
>
> Btw. there isn't much package-level JavaDoc for the BV API in
general
> (only for javax.validation.groups). I think we should add some more
> for BV 1.1. WDYT?
+1 just create a pull request ;-)
>>
>
>
> --hardy
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev