Re: [bv-dev] BVAL-238 Dependency injection in ConstraintViolation

a bv-implementation can use a default implementation (which isn't configured -> it gets instantiated manually). such a default implementation aggregates the configured versions. e.g. if you have cdi + spring in the classpath, only one will return a result. as soon as an implementation returns a result, the rest can be skipped. regards, gerhard 2012/1/4 Michael Nascimento <misterm(a)gmail.com&gt; In most deployment scenarios, I wouldn't expect more than one to be available, so it should simply work. In case more than one is available, we should probably fail with an exception. Regards, Michael On 4 Jan 2012 07:16, "Emmanuel Bernard" <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org&gt; wrote: I'm not sure I follow you exact proposal so let me rephrase and let me know if I am off track. You want we define a service loader http://docs.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/util/ServiceLoader.html to retrieve the expected DI solution. My concern with that is that it's a static solution. What happens if two service providers corresponding to this service are present? Which one to chose and how is the user expected to chose one or the other? I feel like we should keep Bean Validation's configuration away from any "static" approach and let people configure two ValidatorFactory completely independently. On 3 janv. 2012, at 21:55, Gerhard Petracek wrote: > hi, > > i was going to suggest something similar. > > we could provide a simple adapter interface with a method like: > <T> T resolveBean(Class<T> targetType) > (and if we would like to support dependent beans, we should think about an additional dispose method.) > > the only restriction is the manual usage of methods like ValidatorContext#messageInterpolator. > however, since it would be possible to configure those parts via a dependency injection container like cdi, it isn't a big issue. > > regards, > gerhard > > > > 2012/1/3 Michael Nascimento <misterm(a)gmail.com&gt; > What about a different proposal: looking up the interface implementation using ServiceLoader? Then there would be nothing special about it. > > Regards, > Michael > > On 3 Jan 2012 17:25, "Emmanuel Bernard" <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org&gt; wrote: > > _______________________________________________ > beanvalidation-dev mailing list > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > beanvalidation-dev mailing list > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev