Re: [bv-dev] Should getters be considered methods during validation

That should hopefully be the last round. Here are the alternatives that I think are viable http://goo.gl/ubjn3 Please give your feedback. Emmanuel On Tue 2012-10-23 18:19, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > For method validation, we have so far managed to get away with > requiring an annotation based metadata to direct how method validation > behaves. > > One question that popped up during the recent write up is whether or not > getters should be considered regular methods and thus be intercepted and > validation by CDI or AspectJ interceptors. > > I have my own ideas, but I'd like to get your opinion on the subject. > > Emmanuel > _______________________________________________ > beanvalidation-dev mailing list > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev