I am +1 for runtime type consideration.
Seb
On 30.05.2012 20:50, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
For your info, the change is quite minimal
https://github.com/emmanuelbernard/beanvalidation-spec/commit/f85703a2a39...
On 30 mai 2012, at 20:11, Emmanuel Bernard wrote:
> It seems there is some kind of consensus that considering the runtime type instead of
the satin type to build the property path is better.
> Check out
https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/BVAL-226 and let me know if you
object.
>
> Otherwise, I plan to clarify this in the spec.
>
> Emmanuel
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev