Re: [bv-dev] Sanity check

On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org&gt; wrote: > I was working in the ConstraintValidatorContext area and I think Example 3.16. Use of ConstraintValidatorContext was basically wrong. > It seems to me that we were able to return false without creating any ConstraintViolation context. > > I have create a JIRA https://hibernate.onjira.com/browse/BVAL-296 and a pull request https://github.com/beanvalidation/beanvalidation-spec/pull/7 > > Can someone double check to make sure I did not have hallucination. First hallucination: In spec v1.0, this is example 2.16, not 3.16! ;) Was a chapter added? It actually looks to me like this method cannot return false without having created a ConstraintViolation, but rather that it may return true while still having created a ConstraintViolation. Your fix appears to be quite close; however since you have created a second block describing a negative result, you should no longer negate the Collections.disjoint(): "if there are no allowed formats or there are no elements in common (disjoint) between the allowed and guessed formats." Other nits: * the method described is guessFormats(); the calls in the isValid() code lack the trailing 's'. * no need for the second if block to re-call guessFormats(); reuse the local 'guessFormats' variable already assigned to the result of the method call. Matt > > Emmanuel > _______________________________________________ > beanvalidation-dev mailing list > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev