I like the the proposal :)
Currently it do not support new data types like Period or Duration (implementations of
TemporalAmount). But for this types new annotations / constraints are needed. The question
is if this should be supported by the JSR, too.
Am 30.08.2016 um 14:39 schrieb Gunnar Morling
<gunnar(a)hibernate.org>:
Anyone with thoughts/input on supporting the JSR 310 types?
2016-08-25 12:10 GMT+02:00 Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org
<mailto:gunnar@hibernate.org>>:
Hi,
I've pushed another proposal to the website [1], it's about adding @Past/@Future
support for the date/time types added in Java 8 (java.time.* package, added by JSR 310).
The proposal essentially standardizes the proprietary support we had in HV, plus some
additions.
Please let me know what you think, especially on the questions towards the end. Either
put comments inline on the source on GitHub [2] or let's have a discussion here.
I haven't been using JSR 310 extensively myself, so any feedback by those who have is
more than welcome.
Thanks,
--Gunnar
[1]
http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-496/
<
http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-496/>
[2]
https://github.com/beanvalidation/beanvalidation.org/blob/production/prop...
<
https://github.com/beanvalidation/beanvalidation.org/blob/production/prop...
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev