Re: [bv-dev] Method validation - cont'd

> > Interesting point, the more so because I was about to suggest a > proxy-based variation of cross-parameter validation approach #3. > Maybe interface-only per spec, with subclassing as an optional > extension. Thoughts? > Actually, ruminating further on this... the approach I was thinking of would require at least a partial implementation of a given class, just to handle validation (any method result being discarded). The subclassing capability would be necessary regardless of whether only interfaces were supported, so final methods would be the only thing off-limits.