Re: [bv-dev] Proposal for supporting new Java 8 date/time types

I like the the proposal :) Currently it do not support new data types like Period or Duration (implementations of TemporalAmount). But for this types new annotations / constraints are needed. The question is if this should be supported by the JSR, too. Am 30.08.2016 um 14:39 schrieb Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org&gt;: Anyone with thoughts/input on supporting the JSR 310 types? 2016-08-25 12:10 GMT+02:00 Gunnar Morling <gunnar(a)hibernate.org&gt;: > Hi, > > I've pushed another proposal to the website [1], it's about adding > @Past/@Future support for the date/time types added in Java 8 (java.time.* > package, added by JSR 310). The proposal essentially standardizes the > proprietary support we had in HV, plus some additions. > > Please let me know what you think, especially on the questions towards > the end. Either put comments inline on the source on GitHub [2] or let's > have a discussion here. > > I haven't been using JSR 310 extensively myself, so any feedback by those > who have is more than welcome. > > Thanks, > > --Gunnar > > [1] http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-496/ > [2] https://github.com/beanvalidation/beanvalidation.org/ > blob/production/proposals/BVAL-496.adoc > > _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev