Re: [bv-dev] Should getters be considered methods during validation

hi @ all, i agree with emmanuel (as mentioned earlier). @emmanuel: thx for writing the summary! short addition: we also have to think about implicit grouping here. regards, gerhard 2012/11/21 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org&gt; > I tried to summarize all the discussions at http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-327/ > > While I wish we could go the easy way and consider getters as methods, I > really really fear that we would create a time bomb. > > I also polled people at Devoxx trying to explain the pros and cons > and an overwhelming majority of people wanted to not consider getters > as regular constrained methods. > > Emmanuel > > On Tue 2012-10-23 18:19, Emmanuel Bernard wrote: > > For method validation, we have so far managed to get away with > > requiring an annotation based metadata to direct how method validation > > behaves. > > > > One question that popped up during the recent write up is whether or not > > getters should be considered regular methods and thus be intercepted and > > validation by CDI or AspectJ interceptors. > > > > I have my own ideas, but I'd like to get your opinion on the subject. > > > > Emmanuel > > _______________________________________________ > > beanvalidation-dev mailing list > > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev > _______________________________________________ > beanvalidation-dev mailing list > beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev _______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev