Re: [bv-dev] Method validation - cont'd

On 14 mai 2012, at 18:21, Matt Benson wrote: >> >> Interesting point, the more so because I was about to suggest a >> proxy-based variation of cross-parameter validation approach #3. >> Maybe interface-only per spec, with subclassing as an optional >> extension.  Thoughts? >> > > Actually, ruminating further on this... the approach I was thinking of > would require at least a partial implementation of a given class, just > to handle validation (any method result being discarded).  The > subclassing capability would be necessary regardless of whether only > interfaces were supported, so final methods would be the only thing > off-limits. You have lost me :) Can you detail further what you are proposing, maybe with some examples.

_______________________________________________ beanvalidation-dev mailing list beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev