Hi Emmanuel,
many thanks for your feedback.
I've added some comments to your commit via Github. I thought that
might be easier than discussing within the actual document itself,
though I'm still not sure what's the best approach. I guess we'll see
what works out best.
--Gunnar
2012/1/31 Emmanuel Bernard <emmanuel(a)hibernate.org>:
Many thanks Gunnar for this big push!
I've added comments and a few minor fixes. You can find my comments prefixed with
Emmanuel.
You can also use the diff
https://github.com/beanvalidation/beanvalidation.org/commit/bc37cfec514b7...
Emmanuel
On 29 janv. 2012, at 14:28, Gunnar Morling wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've pushed now a first version of the proposal for method validation
> (BV-241) to
beanvalidation.org [1].
>
> The proposal is still missing some parts (e.g. the XML configuration),
> but I hope it touches all major issues related to method validation.
> Throughout the document I've used the "DISCUSSION" marker for sections
> which still need further consideration or a decision between several
> possible options.
>
> I'd be very happy on any feedback related to these issues in
> particular but of course also to the complete proposal in general.
> Don't hesitate to speak up in case you think anything is incomplete,
> is missing or something doesn't make sense to you; after all this is
> very much work in progress. Feel free to add remarks in place within
> the document or start a dedicated discussion on the mailing list.
>
> --Gunnar
>
> [1]
http://beanvalidation.org/proposals/BVAL-241/
> _______________________________________________
> beanvalidation-dev mailing list
> beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev
_______________________________________________
beanvalidation-dev mailing list
beanvalidation-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/beanvalidation-dev