Re: [cdi-dev] [Vote] for CDI-616 resolution

My vote is (a). The current state is that this kind of works, and we would be breaking existing apps by throwing an exception. ________________________________ From: cdi-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org <cdi-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; on behalf of Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; Sent: Wednesday, August 3, 2016 5:21:04 AM To: cdi-dev Subject: [cdi-dev] [Vote] for CDI-616 resolution Hi all, During yesterday(s meeting we discussed how to solve CDI-616 issue. 2 options are possible but we didn't find an agreement, so the best solution here would be to vote. Options are: a) Do nothing about injection in transient fields (todays behaviour) but add a clarification in the spec saying that using them is not supported. b) Throw an exception at boot time if a transient field is an injection point. To vote, just answer to this mail with the letter of your vote. Vote will last 72 hrs from the hour of this mail. Thank you, Antoine ________________________________ NOTICE: This e-mail message and any attachments may contain confidential, proprietary, and/or privileged information which should be treated accordingly. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail, delete this message, and destroy all physical and electronic copies. Thank you.