From: "Antoine Sabot-Durand" <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; To: "CDI Java EE Specification" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 11:29:11 AM Subject: [cdi-dev] [Vote] @Priority value order on ordered events Hi all, As already explained in a previous mail [1], some of us would like change the current order of events to make the highest @Priority value first and the lowest last. This change would be an alinement on how @Alternative work (highest value being the first candidate). If you agree to the change (highest to lowest) vote +1, if you disagree -1 and don't care 0. If you want to discuss thread is always open on [1] but time is running out. Vote will end Monday at 12:00 pm CET. Thanks for your participation. Antoine [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/2016-November/009330.html _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.

+0 Don't really care. Since it's not unified across CDI, having it one way or the other doesn't really make difference to me. Matej ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Antoine Sabot-Durand" <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; > To: "CDI Java EE Specification" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; > Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 11:29:11 AM > Subject: [cdi-dev] [Vote] @Priority value order on ordered events > > Hi all, > > As already explained in a previous mail [1], some of us would like change the > current order of events to make the highest @Priority value first and the > lowest last. This change would be an alinement on how @Alternative work > (highest value being the first candidate). > > If you agree to the change (highest to lowest) vote +1, if you disagree -1 > and don't care 0. If you want to discuss thread is always open on [1] but > time is running out. > > Vote will end Monday at 12:00 pm CET. > > Thanks for your participation. > > Antoine > > [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/2016-November/009330.html > > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code > under the Apache License, Version 2 > (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas > provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual > property rights inherent in such information. _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.

-0.2. @Priority sorting order is already confusing. Thus one has to read about how it's meant to be anyway. But I agree with the argument that I'd expect observers to get invoked in the order of the priority numbers. Means 1 before 2. Feels much more natural to me. LieGrue, strub > Am 08.12.2016 um 12:51 schrieb Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com&gt;: > > +1 > > The sentence "Observers with smaller priority values are called first." > sounds weird. If it were @Order annotation, the sentence would be fine > and natural. But right now, we say that observers with highest priority > are notified last. > > By the way, interceptors are different beasts - an interceptor with the > highest priority is "closest" to the bean method invocation, i.e. it's > the last one which can react BEFORE the bean method is invoked and the > first one which can react AFTER the bean invocation returns (and process > the result). > > Martin > > Dne 8.12.2016 v 11:45 Matej Novotny napsal(a): >> +0 >> >> Don't really care. Since it's not unified across CDI, having it one way or the other doesn't really make difference to me. >> >> Matej >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "Antoine Sabot-Durand" <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; >>> To: "CDI Java EE Specification" <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; >>> Sent: Thursday, December 8, 2016 11:29:11 AM >>> Subject: [cdi-dev] [Vote] @Priority value order on ordered events >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> As already explained in a previous mail [1], some of us would like change the >>> current order of events to make the highest @Priority value first and the >>> lowest last. This change would be an alinement on how @Alternative work >>> (highest value being the first candidate). >>> >>> If you agree to the change (highest to lowest) vote +1, if you disagree -1 >>> and don't care 0. If you want to discuss thread is always open on [1] but >>> time is running out. >>> >>> Vote will end Monday at 12:00 pm CET. >>> >>> Thanks for your participation. >>> >>> Antoine >>> >>> [1] http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/2016-November/009330.html >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> cdi-dev mailing list >>> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >>> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >>> >>> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code >>> under the Apache License, Version 2 >>> (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas >>> provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual >>> property rights inherent in such information. >> _______________________________________________ >> cdi-dev mailing list >> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org >> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >> >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 ( http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information. >> > > -- > Martin Kouba > Software Engineer > Red Hat, Czech Republic > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 ( http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.