August 2012 - cdi-dev - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-23) Allow BeanManager to be resolved as though you were in another bean archive

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-23?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Pete Muir reopened CDI-23: -------------------------- > Allow BeanManager to be resolved as though you were in another bean archive > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-23 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-23 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Portable Extensions, Resolution > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > > Currently it's not possible to access beans as though you were in another bean manager, something that is useful for extensions to be able to do. For example, if I want to create a facade over the ELResolver, or access a particular configuration bean. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-188) Bean in different wars should be allowed to have the same EL name

by Stuart Douglas (Created) (JIRA)

Bean in different wars should be allowed to have the same EL name ----------------------------------------------------------------- Key: CDI-188 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-188 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Stuart Douglas Normally two beans with the same @Named would be treated as an error. If they are in sperate war's this should be allowed. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 1 month

6
11
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDI-112) Clarify how alternatives are enabled

by Shane Bryzak (JIRA)

Clarify how alternatives are enabled ------------------------------------ Key: CDI-112 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-112 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Clarification Components: Beans Affects Versions: 1.0 Reporter: Shane Bryzak The spec is open to interpretation about how alternatives are enabled. One popular interpretation is that alternatives must be enabled within the same bean archive that contains the alternative bean. However, it might be worth considering the merit of enabling an alternative from a deployment archive that contains the bean archive. For example, suppose we have the following deployment archive: foo.war /WEB-INF beans.xml /lib bar.jar /META-INF beans.xml /com /acme AlternativeBean.class It may be worth allowing AlternativeBean.class (a class annotated with @Alternative) to be enabled by listing it in the <alternatives> section of foo.war/WEB-INF/beans.xml. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 1 month

4
8
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-244) Allow public static fields on managed beans which declare any other scope than dependent

by Martin Kouba (JIRA)

Martin Kouba created CDI-244: -------------------------------- Summary: Allow public static fields on managed beans which declare any other scope than dependent Key: CDI-244 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-244 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: Martin Kouba See 3.1. Managed beans: {quote} If a managed bean has a public field, it must have scope @Dependent. If a managed bean with a public field declares any scope other than @Dependent, the container automatically detects the problem and treats it as a definition error. {quote} I see no reason why to disallow public _static_ fields on normal scoped beans. To treat public _non-static_ fields as a definition error due to proxy generation is reasonable. However public static fields are usually referenced by the class name and refering to static fields with an object reference (proxy in this case) is discouraged. Moreover, protected and package-private fields which might also cause confusion around proxies are allowed. BTW Weld allows public static fields on normal scoped beans at the moment. Maybe the spec wording could be: {quote} 3.1. Managed beans If a managed bean has a _non-static_ public field, it must have scope @Dependent. If a managed bean with a _non-static_ public field declares any scope other than @Dependent, the container automatically detects the problem and treats it as a definition error. {quote} -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 1 month

2
7
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-202) Clarify when BeanManager.createBeanAttributes(AnnotatedMember) returns an alternative

by Jozef Hartinger (Created) (JIRA)

Clarify when BeanManager.createBeanAttributes(AnnotatedMember) returns an alternative ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Key: CDI-202 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-202 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Clarification Components: Beans Affects Versions: 1.1.EDR1 Reporter: Jozef Hartinger Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) Currently, a producer field/method is an alternative if it is annotated with @Alternative or an alternative stereotype or the class declaring the field/method is annotated this way. However, when the BeanManager.createBeanAttributes(AnnotatedMember) method is called, the container has no access to the bean that declares the member. Therefore, the specification should clarify whether the container * should examine the AnnotatedType for @Alternative or alternative stereotypes * should try to infer the declaring bean (probably not possible since multiple beans may exist, each of them possibly modified in the ProcessBeanAttributes phase, etc.) * should make an assumption (e.g. the bean that declares the returned BeanAttributes is always assumed not to be an alternative) -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 1 month

3
2
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-208) ConversationScoped.class should be the value of the conversation lifecycle event qualifier

by Jozef Hartinger (Created) (JIRA)

ConversationScoped.class should be the value of the conversation lifecycle event qualifier ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Key: CDI-208 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-208 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Clarification Components: Contexts Affects Versions: 1.1.EDR1 Reporter: Jozef Hartinger Priority: Minor Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) {quote}An event with the ServletRequestEvent as the payload and with qualifier @Initialized(ConversationContext.class) is fired when the conversation context is initialized and an event with qualifier @Destroyed(ConversationContext.class) when the conversation context is destroyed.{quote} ConversationScoped.class should be used instead of ConversationContext.class -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 1 month

2
4
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] Created: (CDI-149) AnnotationLiteral in the CDI API does not cache the hashCode

by Stuart Douglas (JIRA)

AnnotationLiteral in the CDI API does not cache the hashCode ------------------------------------------------------------ Key: CDI-149 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-149 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Bug Reporter: Stuart Douglas Instead it is calculated each time using reflection, which could result in performance problems if lots of annotation literals are in use -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 1 month

4
6
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-212) Clarify BeanManager.createBean()

by Jozef Hartinger (JIRA)

Jozef Hartinger created CDI-212: ----------------------------------- Summary: Clarify BeanManager.createBean() Key: CDI-212 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-212 Project: CDI Specification Issues Issue Type: Clarification Components: Portable Extensions Affects Versions: 1.1.EDR1 Reporter: Jozef Hartinger Fix For: 1.1 (Proposed) It is unclear from the specification whether the BeanManager.createBean() method should ever return an implementation of the Decorator or Interceptor interface. Method parameters of the createBean() method provide all the necessary information for constructing a Decorator implementation. Therefore, IMHO the method should return a container-provided Decorator implementation if the set of stereotypes returned by BeanAttributes.getStereotypes contains javax.decorator.Decorator. On the other hand, Interceptors do not fit this model because the AnnotatedType of the bean class is not available to the method and using the reflection API to scan the bean class directly would not be consistent with the rest of the specification. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 1 month

2
4
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-52) Make it clearer that an InjectionPoint injected into a disposer method refers to the producer method bean and not to the declaring bean

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-52?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Pete Muir commented on CDI-52: ------------------------------ The second issue is a major pita. Not sure we can fix it without breaking backwards compatibility. > Make it clearer that an InjectionPoint injected into a disposer method refers to the producer method bean and not to the declaring bean > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-52 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-52 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Beans > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 1.1.EDR2 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (CDI-52) Make it clearer that an InjectionPoint injected into a disposer method refers to the producer method bean and not to the declaring bean

by Pete Muir (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-52?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sys... ] Pete Muir commented on CDI-52: ------------------------------ Pull to try to get the wording right for the original issue. https://github.com/jboss/cdi/pull/71 I'll take a look at the second conflict in a minute. > Make it clearer that an InjectionPoint injected into a disposer method refers to the producer method bean and not to the declaring bean > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: CDI-52 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-52 > Project: CDI Specification Issues > Issue Type: Clarification > Components: Beans > Affects Versions: 1.0 > Reporter: Pete Muir > Assignee: Pete Muir > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 1.1.EDR2 > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

12 years, 1 month

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

cdi-dev August 2012