Re: [cdi-dev] CDI-88

Pete, There is a typo on your method name. In your pull request it´s "getAnnoatedEventParameter", I believe it should read "getAnnotatedEventParameter" (there is a "t" missing) 2011/6/20 Pete Muir <pmuir(a)bleepbleep.org.uk&gt;: > All > > The 1.0 release contained a bug in the API of CDI (Javadoc and sig tests) - namely we got the ProcessObserverMethod interface totally wrong. It was had a method that was not in the spec, was missing a method and it's generic parameters were wrong. > > On talking to the Oracle compatibility team, it looks like we can fix this error in CDI 1.1 but I am still concerned that this may break user apps and extensions too much. Thoughts? > > The changes to fix this are at https://github.com/jboss/cdi/pull/30 > > Pete > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev > _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev