) but it seems the
proposed changes never actually got to the specification although the
issue is marked as resolved :-/
On 07/08/2014 08:58 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
I struggle with a few TCK tests which assume that in Decorators and
Interceptors you can have an @Inject ct which has a valid InjectionPoint.
But I cannot find in the spec how this is supposed to work.
5.5.7 defines in which situations the CDI container must create an
An instance of InjectionPoint may represent:
. an injected field or a parameter of a bean constructor, initializer
method, producer method, disposer method or observer method, or
. an instance obtained dynamically using Instance.get().
But if you e.g. look at
public OrderedEventDeliveryDecorator(@Delegate Event<T> delegate,
InjectionPoint ip, BeanManager manager,
then this does not fit any requirement imo. Because the Decorator is a
dependent bean on the decorated contextual instance.
Thus it's 'internal' and does not have any InjectionPoint. This would
be different if you would @Inject the Decorator into some other bean...
The TCK test in question is ComplexEventDecoratorTest#testOrderedEvents
Did I overlook something?
cdi-dev mailing list