On 25/08/2015 17:35, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
well was thinking to both but I see it really nice to not rely only
on annotation - and aligned with most specs - since
sometimes you just want to either be able to rely on a loop or a custom config to
register your listeners. Annotations
are too rigid for such cases.
Obviously, if users don't want to use CDI (or MDBs, which are also declarative), then
they would use the normal JMS API.
The existing API to register an async message listener isn't good enough, and we may
improve it in JMS 2.1, but that's
not something that I'd want to bother the people on cdi-dev with.
Nigel