Re: [cdi-dev] @ExcludeClassInterceptors for @InterceptorBinding style ?
I did some further research. There is even a CDI TCK for the @Interceptors case
Look at org.jboss.jsr299.tck.interceptors.tests.method.Dog
But there is not yet a positive nor negative test for @InterceptorBinding style
interceptors.
In OWB we support this, but I guess it's non-portable.
But could indeed be handy to also have it defined in the spec!
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
From: Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
To: cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Cc:
Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 12:11 PM
Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] @ExcludeClassInterceptors for @InterceptorBinding style ?
Hi,
I think the answer is NO because the CDI spec does not mention this
annotation in "9.5 Interceptor resolution" where the process of
matching
interceptors to a business method of a certain bean is defined.
On the other hand it could be a useful feature. WDYT?
BTW Weld does not support this at the moment.
Martin
Dne 3.1.2013 23:37, Mark Struberg napsal(a):
> Hi colleagues!
>
> @ExcludeClassInterceptors do account for @Interceptors style interceptors.
> But should they also disable @InterceptorBinding style interceptors applied
on a class?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev