Re: [cdi-dev] Adding CDI-129 to MR proposed list ?

No, it was just a joke, really! You have been asking if someone has a small topic for the remaining 4 minutes. And I just said that we could try and solve CDI-129 then ;) CDI-129 would first need JavaEE8 to properly define the ClassLoader hierarchy. Before this is fixed we cannot do much in that regard. LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net&gt; > To: cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, 26 November 2013, 3:56 > Subject: [cdi-dev] Adding CDI-129 to MR proposed list ? > > Someone yesterday mentioned CDI 129 (Clarify behaviour of @ApplicationScoped in > EARs) [1] at the end of the meeting. > I didn’t add it to the MR in the 1st place because it seemed a too big issue for > a MR, yet it is a popular one. > > Do you think it’s realistic to add and discuss this issue ? > > > [1] https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-129 > > Antoine > _______________________________________________ > cdi-dev mailing list > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev >