That would have been good info to include!
The sources for the site are in git - https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi-spec.org
particular, FAQs are in https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi-spec.org/tree/master/faq
I guess we can use the github issue tracker for the site, unless anyone violently objects
On 25 Apr 2013, at 08:33, Jens Schumann <jens.schumann(a)openknowledge.de> wrote:
Looks good so far.
There are a few typos/minor issues in the FAQ section. What's the best way
to report them?
Am 24.04.13 14:39 schrieb "Pete Muir" unter <pmuir(a)redhat.com>:
> Hi all
> Please take a look at http://www.cdi-spec.org/
and give it a good review
> before we tweet it etc. :-)
> cdi-dev mailing list