Re: [cdi-dev] BeanConfigurator and ProducerConfigurator consistency

Hi all, Is there any reason I’m missing it is possible to get an Instance in BeanConfigurator produceWith (resp. disposeWith) while it’s not in ProducerConfigurator produceWith (resp. disposeWith)? BeanConfigurator: <U extends T> BeanConfigurator<U> produceWith(Function<Instance<Object>, U> callback); BeanConfigurator<T> disposeWith(BiConsumer<T, Instance<Object>> callback); ProducerConfigurator: <U extends T> ProducerConfigurator<T> produceWith(Function<CreationalContext<U>, U> callback); ProducerConfigurator<T> disposeWith(Consumer<T> callback); Besides, wouldn’t that be more concise in most use cases to provide the equivalent without the Instance parameter in BeanConfigurator (as it was before CDI 2.0.Beta1)?

Thanks, Antonin _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.