What happen if we say nothing? will not hurt later IMHO
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <
https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog
<
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
https://github.com/rmannibucau>
|
LinkedIn <
https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<
http://www.tomitribe.com>
2015-06-24 16:28 GMT+02:00 Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>:
Ok, but now in the chapter I have mention for Session Scope and
conversation Scope not being active in SE. Wouldn't it be strange to have
no mention of Request Scope or should we make a "temp hack" saying that
session scope is not active...
Le mer. 24 juin 2015 à 16:22, Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com> a
écrit :
> Depends on the spec mostly.
>
> For @RequestScoped there is no natural notion of a request in plain Java
> SE. It's the user that needs to set the boundaries of a task that the
> @RequestScope is supposed to represent. This can be done using Weld API
> and hopefully using ContextControl soon. In the meantime I see no point
> in blurring this with magical contexts that try to guess what the use
> wants.
>
> That means that the context is not active by default but can be
> controlled using the API.
>
> On 06/24/2015 03:56 PM, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote:
> > Jozef,
> >
> > Sorry my question wasn't precise enough. What will be the Request
> > Context behavior in your implementation of EDR1 ?
>
>