Re: [cdi-dev] Sorting out the "bean name" mess

PM> All PM> https://issues.jboss.org/browse/CDI-250 PM> The way a bean's name is referred to in the CDI spec is somewhat disjointed. PM> I think this occurred because the CDI spec was written with the term "bean name", but it got changed due to concerns over confusion with: PM> * JSF managed beans name PM> * @ManagedBean name PM> * EJB bean names PM> As a result, we now have a mix of "bean name", "bean EL name", and "name", which is ultimately just confusing. PM> I would like to standardize on a single term, and I would propose PM> "bean name". This is the sort of work that has zero immediate economic value, but much maintenance and quality value. I'm all for harmonizing all the usages to the term "bean name". Ed -- | edward.burns(a)oracle.com | office: +1 407 458 0017 | homepage: | http://ridingthecrest.com/