Re: [cdi-dev] [VOTE] support of implicit bean archive under Java SE

Le 3 juin 2015 à 16:26, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau(a)gmail.com&gt; a écrit : I'd be +1 for the param thats said why not allowing to pass names/regex? javax.enterprise.inject.scan.implicit=myapp-* a bit like EJB modules but with matching pattern(s) Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber <http://www.tomitribe.com/> 2015-06-03 16:14 GMT+02:00 Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net <mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net>>: Hi all, Yesterday during the meeting we had a discussion about implicit bean archive support under Java SE. The idea is to have it disabled by default and provide a way to activate it thru parameter "javax.enterprise.inject.scan.implicit=true”on command line or in the parameter map of the initialize method. Details of the discussion and points of people pro and against this support can be found in meeting log : http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/cdi-dev/2015/cdi-de... <http://transcripts.jboss.org/meeting/irc.freenode.org/cdi-dev/2015/cdi-de... I’d like to call for a vote regarding the support of implicit bean archive under Java SE. This vote will be open for 72 hrs. Answer +1 (yes), 0 (don’t care), -1 (no) to this mail to vote. Thanks Antoine _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html <http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html>). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.