On Mar 19, 2016, at 10:47 AM, Reza Rahman
<reza_rahman(a)lycos.com> wrote:
I definitely think it's an idea worth exploring. It will strengthen CDI's hand
further. It will be great if some of the confusingly redundant APIs like @Singleton could
be deprecated in the process.
BTW, it is really great to see you active in the community!
> On Mar 19, 2016, at 10:49 AM, Manfred Riem <mnriem(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I wrote a little blog entry about a CDI wish I have and in essence it comes
> down to merging JSR-330 into the CDI specification as a sub spec. I realize
> there is history there, but to me it looks like the best course of action.
>
> I had some twitter exchanges about this and some folks are for, some are
> against.
>
> Note I think this is worth exploring as an idea, not something that
> necessarily needs to be in the current JSR, but definitely something that I
> think is worth to do at some point (sooner rather than later in my book).
>
> What do you think?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Kind regards,
> Manfred Riem
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
http://cdi-development-mailing-list.1064426.n5.nabble.com/Merging-JSR-330...
> Sent from the CDI Development mailing list mailing list archive at
Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under
the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all
other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the
Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual
property rights inherent in such information.