On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 08:47, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
This API offers quite a different view onto CDI than BeanManager, and
the comments we've received on CDI 1.0  I believe it is an API that
people are going to find more useful, leaving BeanManager for more "power"
use cases. This was my reason to split it out, but I'm open to other
+1. I find Instance to be my preferred API for narrowing beans and getting
bean instances. It's a real pain when I don't have that available, so I'm
happy to see that CDI is implementing that interface.
Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat | Author of Seam in Action
Registered Linux User #231597