Re: [cdi-dev] Clarification for manually resolving 'Instance'
On 25 Sep 2011, at 21:06, Mark Struberg wrote:
> The parameterized type resolution rules are correct, it's
just there
> is no raw type of Instance to resolve.
Yes, I think too, but was not sure if everyone do see it that way.
Ok, so until I actually see someone make a specific comment, I think we can leave this
alone :-)
> Should there be? Not sure if it would just be more confusing?
I already saw the usage of Instance.class without the TypeLiteral (which is pretty well
hidden in the specs).
And people wondered why that doesn't work ...
Ok, file an issue, we can think about how to improve this.