I can do Friday but not Monday. In the meanwhile, I'll go through the code
changes to add any comments I have.
Many thanks,
Emily
===========================
Emily Jiang
WebSphere Application Server, CDI Development Lead
MP 211, DE3A20, Winchester, Hampshire, England, SO21 2JN
Phone: +44 (0)1962 816278 Internal: 246278
Email: emijiang(a)uk.ibm.com
Lotus Notes: Emily Jiang/UK/IBM@IBMGB
From: Werner Keil <werner.keil(a)gmail.com>
To: cdi-dev <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>,
Date: 21/06/2016 16:33
Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI-30 hangout meeting
Sent by: cdi-dev-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org
As I don't have audio where I am during the day, only Friday (when I leave
earlier in most cases) would work for me.
Werner
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 5:16 PM, <cdi-dev-request(a)lists.jboss.org> wrote:
Send cdi-dev mailing list submissions to
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
cdi-dev-request(a)lists.jboss.org
You can reach the person managing the list at
cdi-dev-owner(a)lists.jboss.org
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of cdi-dev digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: CDI-30 hangout meeting (Antoine Sabot-Durand)
2. Re: CDI-30 hangout meeting (John D. Ament)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 15:13:54 +0000
From: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>
Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI-30 hangout meeting
To: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>, Martin Kouba
<mkouba(a)redhat.com>, Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de>
Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
Message-ID:
<CABu-YBQL7c_BUkBuZztSvnL4yrih4k5Vtvbz_-jf1K=
z1n2gjQ(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
So choices are Friday 24th 5:00 pm CET (same timeslot than our weekly
meeting) or Monday 27th 5:00pm CET.
I can do both but prefer Monday.
What is your choice?
Antoine
Le mar. 21 juin 2016 ? 16:35, John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com> a
?crit :
I just went through the PR one more time. It seems like these are
the
areas of open discussion still:
- The name of the class "ActiveContext" needs to be decided. I'm in
agreement its a bad name, but switching to past tense doesn't help IMHO.
- Disassociating the thread model and the context model. This is the
first change that supports this initiative, so I'm not sure if there are
any concerns with that change.
- The fact that contexts have IDs. To me it makes sense, but it seems
like this is not generally agreed (we need some unique identifier to
make
sure we can bridge from existing)
John
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I'm on PTO until Jun 29 :-(
>
> However, we've already discussed this with Antoine so I think my
> presence is not required.
>
> Martin
>
> Dne 21.6.2016 v 16:23 John D. Ament napsal(a):
> > Unfortunately, my schedule's turned south this week and Friday as of
now
> > is the only day I have open.
> >
> > What about next week? Monday?
> >
> > John
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:42 AM Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com
> > <mailto:mkouba@redhat.com>> wrote:
> >
> > Any day except for Friday is ok for me.
> >
> > I have a feeling that it will be a tough discussion ;-)
> >
> > What I particularly dislike:
> > * ActiveContext.associate(Thread thread)
> > * the concept of the context id
> > * scopeType as a method param (I would prefer a specific
> method/class
> > for each supported scope)
> >
> > Anyway, if you look at Weld Context Management API [1] you'll
find
> out
> > that it's pretty powerful but also quite complex. And I don't
> believe we
> > will be able to achieve the same level of funcionality with less
> complex
> > API (without sacrificing correctness).
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > [1]
> >
>
http://docs.jboss.org/weld/reference/latest/en-US/html/contexts.html#_man...
> >
> >
> > Dne 21.6.2016 v 09:22 Mark Struberg napsal(a):
> > > Somewhen this week in the evening (CEST).
> > > I?ll have a low availability for the following 2 weeks.
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >> Am 20.06.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Antoine Sabot-Durand
> > <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net <mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net>>:
> > >>
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> We launched the idea to organize a meeting regarding John's
> > proposal regarding CDI-30:
> > >>
https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/291
> > >>
> > >> I wasn't available last week (going to a conference) but I am
> > this week.
> > >>
> > >> So what are your favorite slots for this meeting ?
> > >>
> > >> Antoine
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> cdi-dev mailing list
> > >> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> > >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> > >>
> > >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
> > licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2
> > (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
> > ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
> > other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > cdi-dev mailing list
> > > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> > >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> > >
> > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
> > licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2
> > (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
> > ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
> > other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Martin Kouba
> > Software Engineer
> > Red Hat, Czech Republic
> > _______________________________________________
> > cdi-dev mailing list
> > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
> >
> > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
licenses
> > the code under the Apache License, Version 2
> > (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
> > ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
> > other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
> >
>
> --
> Martin Kouba
> Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Czech Republic
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160621/c30cfd7d/at...
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 11:16:23 -0400
From: "John D. Ament" <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [cdi-dev] CDI-30 hangout meeting
To: Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>
Cc: cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Message-ID:
<
CAOqetn_3uk-WxjhT438TFueB3_fYnXQfmw+NHpFrZ2BZ3ZJBXw(a)mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Monday is better for me but I can do both.
On Jun 21, 2016 11:14, "Antoine Sabot-Durand" <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>
wrote:
So choices are Friday 24th 5:00 pm CET (same timeslot than our
weekly
meeting) or Monday 27th 5:00pm CET.
I can do both but prefer Monday.
What is your choice?
Antoine
Le mar. 21 juin 2016 ? 16:35, John D. Ament <john.d.ament(a)gmail.com> a
?crit :
> I just went through the PR one more time. It seems like these are the
> areas of open discussion still:
>
> - The name of the class "ActiveContext" needs to be decided. I'm in
> agreement its a bad name, but switching to past tense doesn't help
IMHO.
> - Disassociating the thread model and the context model. This is
the
> first change that supports this initiative, so I'm not sure if there
are
> any concerns with that change.
> - The fact that contexts have IDs. To me it makes sense, but it seems
> like this is not generally agreed (we need some unique identifier to
make
> sure we can bridge from existing)
>
> John
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>
>> I'm on PTO until Jun 29 :-(
>>
>> However, we've already discussed this with Antoine so I think my
>> presence is not required.
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> Dne 21.6.2016 v 16:23 John D. Ament napsal(a):
>> > Unfortunately, my schedule's turned south this week and Friday as of
>> now
>> > is the only day I have open.
>> >
>> > What about next week? Monday?
>> >
>> > John
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 4:42 AM Martin Kouba <mkouba(a)redhat.com
>> > <mailto:mkouba@redhat.com>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Any day except for Friday is ok for me.
>> >
>> > I have a feeling that it will be a tough discussion ;-)
>> >
>> > What I particularly dislike:
>> > * ActiveContext.associate(Thread thread)
>> > * the concept of the context id
>> > * scopeType as a method param (I would prefer a specific
>> method/class
>> > for each supported scope)
>> >
>> > Anyway, if you look at Weld Context Management API [1] you'll
find
>> out
>> > that it's pretty powerful but also quite complex. And I don't
>> believe we
>> > will be able to achieve the same level of funcionality with less
>> complex
>> > API (without sacrificing correctness).
>> >
>> > Martin
>> >
>> > [1]
>> >
>>
http://docs.jboss.org/weld/reference/latest/en-US/html/contexts.html#_man...
>> >
>> >
>> > Dne 21.6.2016 v 09:22 Mark Struberg napsal(a):
>> > > Somewhen this week in the evening (CEST).
>> > > I?ll have a low availability for the following 2 weeks.
>> > >
>> > > LieGrue,
>> > > strub
>> > >
>> > >> Am 20.06.2016 um 16:55 schrieb Antoine Sabot-Durand
>> > <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net
<mailto:antoine@sabot-durand.net>>:
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi all,
>> > >>
>> > >> We launched the idea to organize a meeting regarding
John's
>> > proposal regarding CDI-30:
>> > >>
https://github.com/cdi-spec/cdi/pull/291
>> > >>
>> > >> I wasn't available last week (going to a conference) but I
am
>> > this week.
>> > >>
>> > >> So what are your favorite slots for this meeting ?
>> > >>
>> > >> Antoine
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> cdi-dev mailing list
>> > >> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
<mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> > >>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>> > >>
>> > >> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
>> > licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2
>> > (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
>> > ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
>> > other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > cdi-dev mailing list
>> > > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> > >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>> > >
>> > > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
>> > licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2
>> > (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
>> > ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
>> > other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>> > >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Martin Kouba
>> > Software Engineer
>> > Red Hat, Czech Republic
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cdi-dev mailing list
>> > cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:cdi-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>> >
>> > Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider
licenses
>> > the code under the Apache License, Version 2
>> > (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other
>> > ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and
>> > other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Martin Kouba
>> Software Engineer
>> Red Hat, Czech Republic
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/cdi-dev/attachments/20160621/3e4c083b/at...
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
End of cdi-dev Digest, Vol 67, Issue 12
***************************************
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
Unless stated otherwise above:
IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number
741598.
Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU