Re: [cdi-dev] Do we already have a kind of CDI SE in 1.1+ ?

Of course Jozef: We need something more controllable in CDI 2.0. But it can be a basic alternative that works right now in CDI 1.2. Antoine Sabot-Durand Le 19 déc. 2014 à 12:24, Jozef Hartinger <jharting(a)redhat.com&gt; a écrit : Interesting idea (for CDI 1.2 containers running in SE). As you wrote for CDI 2.0 we need much more. On 12/19/2014 12:03 PM, Antoine Sabot-Durand wrote: Hi guys, As I said during last meeting I was puzzled by the non use of CDI and CDIProvider to address CDI boot in Java SE. I just made a small test adding this class to weld-se : public class WeldSEProvider extends WeldProvider { private static boolean firstTime = true; @Override public CDI<Object> getCDI() { if (firstTime) { new Weld().initialize(); firstTime = false; } return super.getCDI(); } } and replaced the content of META-INF/services/javax.enterprise.inject.spi.CDIProvider by my provider org.jboss.weld.environment.se.WeldSEProvider Using this new version of Weld-se in my project Iw as able to boot CDI without implementation classes : public class Main { public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { CDI cdi = CDI.current(); BeanManager bm = cdi.getBeanManager(); } } Code is available in my weld fork : https://github.com/antoinesd/weld-core/blob/2.2-SE/environments/se/core/s... Similar CDIProvider can be written for OWB as well. I may have missed something, but I think we can figure out something like that to provide SE support in CDI today, even if it’s not as complete as the one we plan to push in CDI 2.0 Antoine _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the code under the Apache License, Version 2 (http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other intellectual property rights inherent in such information.