Re: [cdi-dev] Moving to JSR-348

Yes, but the PMO told me I needed a unanimous vote I think ;-) Sorry for the extra work! On 7 Dec 2011, at 15:16, Mark Struberg wrote: > +1 > > (we already voted on this, didn't we?) > > LieGrue, > strub > > > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com&gt; >> To: Joseph Bergmark <bergmark(a)us.ibm.com>; norman.erck(a)holisticon.de; mathieu.ancelin(a)gmail.com; George Gastaldi <gegastaldi(a)gmail.com>; Richard Hightower <richardhightower(a)gmail.com>; Werner Keil < werner.keil(a)gmx.net>; Jérôme Petit <jerome.petit(a)serli.com>; Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>; Mark Struberg <struberg(a)yahoo.de>; Sivakumar Thyagarajan <sivakumar.thyagarajan(a)oracle.com&gt; >> Cc: cdi-dev <cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; >> Sent: Wednesday, December 7, 2011 11:18 AM >> Subject: Moving to JSR-348 >> >> Joseph, Norman, Mathieu, George, Richard, Werner, Jerome, Antoine, Mark, Siva, >> >> We would like to move JSR-346 to the new process defined by JSR-348. >> >> The JCP PMO have raised two points: >> >> 1) A unanimous yes vote from the EG members listed on the JCP page >> http://www.jcp.org/en/jsr/summary?id=346 makes it clearer we can move. >> 2) The JSR submission makes note of a private alias for EG members. We've >> not used that at any point, so we would also like a clear vote from you to >> remove that private alias. >> >> Finally, I've clarified the feedback process at >> https://github.com/jboss/cdi/wiki#wiki-feedback - you might want to subscribe to >> cdi-feedback. I will forward anything relevant to cdi-dev anyway. >> >> Pete >> _______________________________________________ cdi-dev mailing list cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev