Antoine, I've lost track of this topic. Is the document somewhere ? Can we
easily see the diffs ?
Managed Beans are already confusing.... turning it to "bean" can be even
more confusing.
Antonio
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Pete Muir <pmuir(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On 15 Apr 2015, at 13:31, Antoine Sabot-Durand <antoine(a)sabot-durand.net>
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Rethinking of this task and reading the feedback on this, I really think
we should go step by step on this splitting.
>
> What I have produced here is a full extraction of EJB in the spec to put
it in EE part.
Yes, this is a great start.
> There are still Java EE references in core with EL, JSF, Servlet.
I’m least worried about EL, most about JSF and Serlet.
>
> The more problematic part is the Contexts chapter: hard to remove
servlet ref without rewriting all...
>
> And yes, I did some rewording that could be no very nice.
>
> In some places I replaces "Managed Beans or Session Beans" by the
generic term "bean”.
This is definitely not ok, as you expanded the scope of the sentence to
include built-in beans, producer methods, producer fields, and custom
beans. I would suggest providing list of these changes, so we can review
each one.
> Java EE component was replaced by component (yes, I'm not sure it is
very meaningful)
I also think this is problematic. A Java EE component is a specific thing.
I would suggest providing list of these changes, so we can review each one.
>
> In the EE part, I added changed all "session bean" occurrences by
"EJB
session bean”.
Ok, I don’t think this is a problem.
>
> The step I see are:
>
> 0) Validate that we're all ok with the principle of splitting
> 1) validate that all EJB references are removed from core
> 2) Correct bad terminology that I introduced
>
> And then we should continue the splitting by rewriting the contexts
chapter and EL references in Core.
+1
>
> Antoine
> _______________________________________________
> cdi-dev mailing list
> cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
>
> Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
_______________________________________________
cdi-dev mailing list
cdi-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/cdi-dev
Note that for all code provided on this list, the provider licenses the
code under the Apache License, Version 2 (
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.html). For all other ideas
provided on this list, the provider waives all patent and other
intellectual property rights inherent in such information.
--
Antonio Goncalves
Software architect, Java Champion and Pluralsight author
Web site <